What are Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs), Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs), and Data Protection by Design and Default (DPbDD), and how do they differ?

Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs), Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs), and Data Protection by Design and Default (DPbDD) are interconnected concepts under UK data protection law. While they all aim to support compliance and protect personal data, they serve different roles within that framework.

 

Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs)

A DPIA is a structured process used by organisations to identify, assess, and reduce risks associated with processing personal data.[1] It is particularly important where processing is likely to pose a high risk to individuals’ rights and freedoms. Under the Data Protection Act 2018 and the UK GDPR, a DPIA is mandatory in certain situations, including large-scale data processing and the use of innovative technologies such as AI.

A DPIA must include several key elements: a description of the processing activity, an assessment of its necessity and proportionality, an evaluation of risks to individuals, and the measures in place to address those risks.[2] It should also outline safeguards, security measures, and mechanisms to ensure the protection of personal data.

Because AI systems are often complex and potentially intrusive, their use will frequently fall into the high-risk category, meaning a DPIA is generally expected.[3]

Case law highlights the importance of DPIAs being thorough and effective. For example, the Court of Appeal found a DPIA inadequate where it failed to properly assess risks to individuals and did not clearly set out measures to address those risks, as required by law.[4]

Further guidance on when a DPIA is required is provided by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), based on Recital 91 of the GDPR and discussed in legal commentaries.[5]

 

Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs)

A Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) is a tool used to evaluate the privacy implications of a project involving personal data. It is typically used where a full DPIA is not required under the UK GDPR.[6]

PIAs are generally simpler and optional. They help organisations identify and address privacy risks in lower-risk projects that do not meet the threshold for a mandatory DPIA. Although not a legal requirement, a PIA can serve as a useful preventative measure to support compliance and manage risks early in a project.

For example, a PIA may be used in the development or review of surveillance camera systems to assess their impact on privacy, justify their use, and ensure appropriate safeguards are in place.[7] This supports transparency and compliance with legal obligations.[8]

PIAs also form part of a broader compliance toolkit. Alongside measures such as data minimisation, anonymisation, and robust information security, they help organisations demonstrate accountability and adherence to data protection principles.

 

Data Protection by Design and Default (DPbDD)

Data Protection by Design and Default (DPbDD) is both a general principle and a legal requirement under Article 25 of the UK GDPR. It requires organisations to consider data protection and privacy at the design stage of any system, service, product, or process, and throughout its lifecycle.[9]

As a regulatory requirement, organisations must implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure compliance with data protection principles, such as data minimisation, purpose limitation, and storage limitation. These measures must ensure that, by default, only the personal data necessary for specific purposes is processed.[10]

In practice, DPbDD requires organisations to embed data protection into their operations from the outset. Early consideration is essential, and DPIAs can act as a key tool in supporting its implementation, particularly in high-risk scenarios.[11]

Responsibility for compliance lies with the data controller, including oversight of third-party processors. The Information Commissioner's Office considers the implementation of technical and organisational measures when determining regulatory action, including fines for non-compliance.[12]

 

Conclusion

DPIAs, PIAs, and Data Protection by Design and Default (DPbDD) are complementary tools that support organisations in meeting their data protection obligations under the UK GDPR. While DPIAs provide a structured and, in some cases, mandatory approach to identifying and mitigating high-risk processing activities, PIAs offer a more flexible and preventative method for addressing privacy concerns in lower-risk projects. DPbDD, by contrast, establishes an overarching obligation to embed data protection principles into systems and processes from the outset and throughout their lifecycle. Together, these mechanisms promote accountability, ensure that risks to individuals are properly managed, and support organisations in maintaining compliance with data protection requirements.

 

Disclaimer:

This article is published on 13 April 2026 by Dilmurod Erkinov at Edu-LegalTech. The information contained herein is accurate as of the date of publication and is provided for general informational and educational purposes only.

This article does not constitute legal, financial, or any other form of professional advice. It should not be relied upon as a substitute for obtaining independent advice tailored to specific circumstances. Organisations, individuals, and other readers are strongly encouraged to seek appropriate advice from qualified and certified professionals before taking or refraining from any action based on the content of this article.

While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information presented, no representations or warranties, express or implied, are made regarding its completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The author accepts no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on this content.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any affiliated organisations.

 

Bibliography:
 

[1] Data Protection Act 2018 c. 12 s. 64

[2] Hurfurt v Information Commissioner First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)[2026] UKFTT 326 (GRC

[3] section 64 of the Data Protection Act 2018

[4] R. (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales, [2020] EWCA Civ 1058)

[5] The Law of Artificial Intelligence, 2nd Ed.

[6] How to complete a data protection impact assessment

 

[7] The Development or use of Surveillance Camera Systems

[8] Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights

[9] Article 25(1) addresses data protection by design, while Article 25(2) focuses on data protection by default.

[10] How to implement data protection by design and default

[11] Data protection impact assessments—DPIAs—overview - Data protection impact assessments—DPIAs—overview > Overlap with data protection by design and default (DPbDD) and privacy impact assessments (PIAs) - Paragraph 5S9Y-XXC1-DYV1-S26J-00000-00.xml_UKNEWC1-433585_19

[12] How to implement data protection by design and default (DPbDD) > Responsibility for compliance > Responsibility of data controller - Paragraph 61CN-TTM3-GXFD-83C0-00000-00.xml_UKNEWC1-231801_32.

We need your consent to load the translations

We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.